ERA4
EFFECTIVELY AND EFFICIENTLY REVIEWING AUDIT WORKPAPERS

Reviewing workpapers is a critical internal quality control safeguard that ensures issued audit reports are appropriate given the specific engagement's circumstances. There is a presumption that more experienced engagement team members should review work performed by less experienced staff. The objective of this course is to provide tips and techniques for effective and efficient review of audit workpapers, the success of which heavily depends on an auditor's proper understanding and application of certain critical financial statement audit concepts such as assessing audit risk, applying substantive analytical procedures, and auditing areas of estimates and uncertainty.

Major Topics:

  • The primary purpose of audit documentation and minimum documentation requirements
  • Tips for an efficient workpaper review process that complies with relevant standards
  • Emphasizing how to audit certain financial statement areas that commonly contain significant judgments or conclusions that require strong supporting audit documentation, including when consultations may be appropriate (e.g., substantive analytical procedures and estimates)
  • The critical role of the engagement partner related to the overall quality of an engagement
  • The responsibilities of the engagement quality control reviewer in evaluating the significant judgments the engagement team made and conclusions reached in formulating the report
  • The importance of monitoring compliance with engagement quality control policies and procedures

Learning Objectives:

  • Describe the most important financial statement audit documentation requirements
  • Discuss areas of critical auditor judgments that impact the nature and extent of audit documentation needed to support audit conclusions
  • Explain the importance of establishing, applying, and monitoring quality control policies and procedures related to audit documentation

Designed For: Public accounting professionals with audit supervision and review responsibilities
Level of Knowledge: Intermediate
Prerequisite: Involvement in supervision, review, or other quality control functions
Advanced Preparation: None
Credits: 4